To study the osseointegration of dental implants placed in Beagle dogs using an adapted surgical technique and to compare it with conventional method by estimating implant stability by Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Dental implants were placed bilaterally in the mandible of Beagle dogs using press-fit as well as undersized implant bed preparation technique. Assessment of primary stability was carried out 0 day, 2weeks and 12weeks after implantation using the RFA method, and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values were recorded.

Abstract
Objective: To study the osseointegration of dental implants placed with a modified surgical technique
in Beagle dogs and to compare it with the conventional method.
Materials and methods: Dental implants were placed bilaterally in the mandible of Beagle dogs using
the press-fit as well as undersized implant bed preparation technique. Micro computer tomography
(micro-CT) and histometric methods were used to analyze the bone implant contact and bone volume
(BV) around the implants.

The benefits of full mouth implant reconstruction include increased chewing ability, bone preservation, improved speech and an improved aesthetic for an edentulous patient. Full mouth rehabilitation for a medically compromised patient is complex and often requires a comprehensive multideciplinary approach. a 62 year old male patient with ill-fitting maxillary and mandibular removable partial dentures was presented for dental implant treatment to replace his existin prostheses.

Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of this in vitro study were to investigate the sensitivity and
reliability of the Osstell_ systems (Resonance Frequency Analysis – RFA) compared to the Periotest
_ system in implant bone simulated conditions. Three conditions were simulated: (1) the direct
fixture-bone contact and fibrous tissue fixture contact, (2) The different levels of horizontal bone
loss, and (3) The hardening implant–bone interface.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of dental personnel and patients in
ascertaining the shade of natural teeth compared to the electronic shade matching devices. Five groups
(10 each) of participants were selected: prosthodontists, general practitioners, dental interns, dental
technicians and dental patients. Shade selection was carried out using Vitapan classical shade guides
to mach seven shade tabs (A1, A3, B2, B3, C2, C4 and D3) of the same shade guide. The electronic shade

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the interreter repeatbility in shade matching procedure, and to determine if differences exist in selection of particular common shades. Five groups (10 each) of participants were selected: prosthodontists, dentists, dental interns, dental technicians and dental patients. Shade selection was carried out using Vitapan classical shade guides to match seven shade tabs. (A1, A3, B2, B3, C2, C4 and D3) of the same shade guide. Shade tabs label were masked and the shade selection was carried out through two rounds with an interval of one week time.